Friday, 13 January 2012

DNC Board Meeting Minutes - January 13, 2012

DNC Board Meeting
January 13 2012

Board members: Tami, Jada, Ivan, Paul, Dave M, Harold, Ann, Herb, Jamie, Joe, Louie, Kelvin, Wendy
Guests: Gary, Dave D, John, Yvonne, Leo

Agenda
MOTION (Moved Paul): To accept with additions, Announcement on DTES Not For Developers Coalition; City and Postering; 611 Main Film. (Seconded Herb, Passed unan)

2012 Action Planning
Ivan
-      Introduces the report on the 2012 action planning
Wendy
-      Maybe it'll help to work on what the main points are, what are we bottomlining?
-      The ones that are listed as our main campaigns we are already working on and we need to keep doing
Herb
-      We should also consider the political climate. The Omnibus crime bill and the new prisons coming mean that we should also prioritize our policing campaign. This is going to be more and more of an issue
Joe
-      We can work on getting services here as a recycling plan. We can recycle old computer parts and get work here
Paul
-      We need to rattle the cage of Stephen Harper and broaden our political attacks and get a social housing policy
Ann
-      We should prepare for our general meeting if nothing else.
-      We could present on two things:
-      Focus for 2012 and
-      Our main campaigns for 2012
Harold
-      There are two questions we're dealing with and they're actually interlinked. One is to build the organization and get people involved; The other is to set goals and decide on campaigns that get us there.
-      We should not just take on campaigns without knowing our goals
-      But there are also certain campaigns that we cannot drop because of our investment in the work
-      We should not come in with a laundry list of what we should be involved in without first addressing our capacity.
Jamie
-      I agree with Harold that we should not spread ourselves too thin and try to put out too many fires.
-      We should think about paring it down and focussing on what brings us closer to our goals
-      There is a danger that if we're spread too thin then we
Ivan
-      Given the political climate – federally, provincially, municipally – it might be naive to focus on winning some reforms now
-      I think we should work on developing organizational capacity, our networks and connections
Wendy
-      I agree that we should focus on organizational development
-      The only campaigns that we need to focus on are street market and policing, other campaigns are being driven by CCAP and other groups
-      Organizational goals could include getting more women involved, Chinese residents and families too
Ann
-      So we could go through these points and decide which ones we have agreement to work on
Herb
-      Some of these we could off load to the LAPP: The pool, the 10 sites, wireless internet,

Dave Murray
-      Policing is really important.  Vandu is working on this already, good to coordinate with other organizations already doing this.  Ending prohibition has been in the works already for a long time. Vandu is campaigning around ticketing.  Getting police involved, they don't show up in the community for meetings except maybe the Urban Core.

Harold
-      We need people to participate in campaigns even if it's not DNC work.  I don't want us to do tons of work on housing one year and then nothing the next year.  Let's not do an either-or-choice. We're going to have to respond to different things, it's dynamic.

Joe
-      There is a smoking ban now all Metro Vancouver.  The police were in Oppenheimer Park and Pidgeon Park.

Paul
-      We always have to be ready.  We have to take the lead
-      AFD monitor when police have interactions with Aboriginal people
-      Vandu is doing a great job monitoring
-      We need to offer our support.  LAPP has to be one of our first priorities – all those things are going to come into the LAPP – pool, housing etc.

Ivan
-      Emphasis on organizational and skills building
-      Shift an emphasis of organizing and campaigns

Ann
-   They are not exclusive
-      We need to be more deliberate

Ivan
-      I can't be running around doing campaign work if I want to help/assist others to work on organizing.  The way everyone communicates is different.  If we want to focus on this level of organization I can't do it all, and it will take twice as long.

Ann
-      Getting ready for tomorrows meeting, we need to be visual

Herb
-      If we focus on organizational skills, we need to outreach into our membership to find out their skills and their capacity, the better we are to deal with fires or other campaigns

Tami
-      Get our general membership to sign up to committee work
-      Meeting time?  Friday interferes with my long term committment with another meeting involvement and vice versa.
-      Thursday at 5pm, with Tuesday at 5pm as a backup, at Jacobs Well

Table discussions, move to board positions.

Ivan
-      Lists the nominees for Co-Presidents
-      Explains the Co-Presidents role
-      Does anyone want to withdrawl?

Ann
-      Would like to chair some meetings

Ivan
-      Every board member can chair meetings

Herb
-      Want to wait to hear if he gets Kenya trip

Ann
-      What about 3 presidents?  Fascists Chile does it
-      Paul is going to be far
-      Move to make it Tami, Herb and Paul – backup for Paul if he's away

Ivan
-      Move a motion to elect Tami, Herb & Paul
-      Herb and Paul abstains from vote.
-      Motion carried: Co-Presidents are Tami, Herb and Paul

Ivan
-      General Meeting Coordinator
-      Need to choose bottom-liner, it's been Wendy and defaulting to Ivan
-      Wendy & Ivan are the shared bottom-liners

Ivan
-      Site Coordinator
-      Who wants to do this?

Ann
-      If we get a LAPP site we need to seize it for the DNC.  We need to push for a space.
-      Is anyone on the LAPP committee not on the site coordinator list?

Ivan
-      Ann you seem interested in this question, do you want to be close to this?

Ann
-      Yes

Ivan
-      LAPP Committee Rep
-      Any opposition to Wendy maintaining this?

Herb
-      When the LAPP meeting starts, I thought we were going to have a rotating rep?

Wendy
-      There is one seat for sure DNC, I was elected last year for that seat
-      There is the job for the general liaison with the City, that came out of CCAP
-      We should try to buddy with this.

Ann
-      Nominate Herb to be Wendy's shadow for the LAPP

Ivan
-      Treasurer
-      Roland would like to be treasurer unless Ann is opposed
-      Motion to make Roland is the treasurer, with Ann as a mentor and backup

Ivan
-      Fundraising
-      Jada eyes and ear to this
-      Write grants for funding, nothing is coming in so far
-      Yvonne to help too, she has connections with the Nishka
-      Persons involved: Jada, Herb, Wendy, Yvonne

Ivan
-      Advocacy
-      We collect the advocacy skills of all board members so we can refer board members
-      Dave Murray to coordinate, email everyone requesting it

Ivan
-      Elders Council
-      Kelvin is going to work on this

Ivan
-      Spiritual Advisor
-      Kelvin and Jen
-      Role to make sure nobody is burning out, checking-in on emotional, physically, etc., fun activities

Ivan
-      Publication
-      Wait for report

Ivan
-      Communications Secretary
-      Ivan has been doing this
-      Dave Hamm wants to help out, with postering etc.  I don't have time to do other stuff
-      Herb wants to help
-      Roland has website skills
-      Everyone should work on this, divide it into 3 types of tasks

Jamie
-      Dan Blair has years of experience doing this kind of stuff, he wants to help, use him as a resource.
-      Add him as a volunteer, he's an asset

Ivan
-      Street Market Coordinator

Dave Hamm
-      It's a committee

Ivan
-      Who's the point-person, bottom-liner

Dave Murray
-      I've inherited it, but have help from Ann and Wendy

Ivan
-      Dave Murray to remain point of contact, liaison

Ivan
-      Media Secretary
-      Teach people once in a while on different parts, skill-sharing
-      Somebody who is coordinating needs to have an email
-      Ivan is the bottom-liner, supporting other people

Ivan
-      Board Meeting Coordinator
-      Should be shared with Co-Presidents
-      Presidents with task-master?
-      The Coordinator is the Presidents
-      Richard and DJ should help with General Meetings

Wendy
-      Legal Secretary
-      Louis wants to learn about this, he's willing to do this with some report
-      Wendy, Roland, Letitizia, Louis, Ann, Jada
-      Louis as the bottom-liners, with support from others

Ivan
-      Membership Secretary
-      Sarah and Lorna has been working on this
-      Louis wants to learn more about this
-      Legal and Membership go together
-      Louis as the bottom-liner with support from Roland, Jamie, Wendy, Jada, Elroy, Sarah B, Lorna, Letizia

Ivan
-      We will take these positions to the meeting tomorrow for the GM
-      Back at the action planning point, we need to know what to present
-      Page 2 – Do we continue these...:
-      LAPP: Yes - Active
-      Street Market: Yes - Active
-      Tenant Union: Yes
-      Fight for 10 Sites: Drop it into active campaigns but simmering, incorporate into all of our work.

Joe
- Keep an eye on the sites we want.

Harold
-      There is an ongoing coalition, some of it is shifting to coalition work

Ivan
-      Homelessness & Shelter Committee: Yes – Active
-      Policing: Yes – Active
-      Participate in these coalitions?
-      End Prohibition: As it has been
-      Raise the rates: Greater Emphasis
-      DTES not for Developers: As it has been, simmering
-      Other Campaigns
-      Arts & Culture: Hibernating
-      Publications: Wait until project proposed. Tabled.
-      Education: Ivan thinks we should have discussion groups on this.
-      Free Wireless Internet: Nobody is working on this, mention in LAPP.
-      Pool: LAPP.
-      Justice: Now policing committee.

Joe
-      Good idea to have a committee about missing women's inquiry

Ivan:
-      Policing: Jen is the bottom-liner, with support from Ann, Jada, Wendy
-      Homelessness: Roland
-      End Prohbition: Dave Murray, Ann, Dave D.
-      Arts & Culture: Plug into the LAPP
-      All the committees/campaigns can have sign-up sheets at tomorrows GM

Ivan
-      Item 3, c. Natural Community Member, Grant Fraser

Grant
-      Involved in social activism
-      Stand up and support people in this community
-      Wants group to grow with members outside the community so powers at be can't ignore us

Paul
-      Stance on mix-community, social?

Grant
-      No problem with that
-      I don't like segregation of rich and poor
-      Rather see mix
-      Like to see no rich or poor,everyone treated the same
-      Can't have rich moving in and taking over
-      Equal rights to rich and poor
-      In theory its a good idea
-      Live Nanaimo and Broadway, don't spend most of time in community, work downtown
-      Don't spend as much time down here as I'd like

Wendy
-      Would support Grant's application
-      Explains Natural Community Member

Dave Hamm
-      Keep spots open for community members?

Wendy
-      Activists are important and we need to keep connections
-      Make sure that people using services here are saved spots

Harold
-      In this case definitely in favour for Grant, he has something to contribute
-      It can be an issue with people with the wrong attitude and that's what I look for and I don't think that's the issue here, that's why I'm voting yes.
-      We do want to reserve some spots, we're not overwhelmed with applications

Yvonne
-      Lived in Burnaby, down in East Van since 1972
-      Shunned because I don't live here because I'm more involved then a lot of people

Grant
-      Always going to be around
-      If getting closed to 10%, no problem stepping out so the spot is available

Grant steps outside.

Ivan
-      Anything more to say?

Dave Murray
-      Friends of the DNC meet his criteria a lot more, better, if existed

Wendy
-      If he self-identifies as a DNC member in front of Council, not the same

Ivan
-      Ask him to form a Friends of the DNC, he can take that on? Fundraising, promoting DNC outside the community.

Paul
-      Skills he can bring
-      We say we're DNC members
-      We should support him

Ivan
-      Unanimous recommendation of Grant Fraser as a Natural Community Member, and ask him to take on the Friends of the DNC committee, or take a role therein.

Ivan
-      4.b

Dave D.
-      Explains End Drug Prohibition Forum
-      Want DNC name on the poster as one of the hosts, seems fitting
-      Campaign we were already a part of

Harold
-      It's a part of campaign, and clearly identified and our membership fully understands this

Dave M.
-      There will be a series of these forums

Ivan
-      Motions to endorse, Ann and Dave to present at GM, Paul seconds.

Dave D.
-      February the 8th at the Carnegie, public forum and discussion and everyone is invited

Herb
-      Announcement at the GM

Ivan
-      Motion carries unanimously.

Wendy
-      LAPP Report
-      Letter from Scott from ALIVE
-      Confirm ALIVE's participation on the LAPP?
-      Wendy reads letter
-      We should resend letter to him, October or November letter, the letter says that we welcome them a seat on the LAPP
-      Maybe he just missed that last paragraph
-      Forward him the originally letter, and the City can see that we had a gracious correspondence

Harold
-      Two things here
-      The guy is lying, whatever, it's an interpretation
-      We need to prove that we acted in good faith, with this evidence
-      Faced with a situation that it could get explosive but we don't want to get into that
-      We need to cool it

Ann
-      Agrees with Wendy
-      I don't know where Scott comes from, or who he is
-      He behaves like a bully
-      Send a letter, but we need to be prepared for the next thing
-      They don't think it's being done democratically
-      We need to prove that we are consulting a wide group of people

Herb
-      January 20th meeting
-      Extending invitation – differences that we're willing to work through them
-      Leave a trail of evidence that we gave them every opportunity to participate

Wendy
-      Wendy to draft a letter to Scott?

Ann
-      Motion for Wendy to write a letter to Scott to re-explain
-      Wendy motion, Ann seconds.

Ivan
-      4.c DT East Newspaper
-      Dan can do the design?
-      Dave D. Says he has a bunch of time.
-      Proposal: Have Dave D. Be the overall coordinator for this project
-      Ivan explains the roles and everything else to do with this idea
-      5,000 papers a month for $800 a month
-      Ivan knows a professor that would donate $250 a month forever
-      Ivan can look for more, intellects like to fund publications and they like to see where there money is going towards
-      This is a working suggestion...the first issue, Dave D. Has called a meeting for this week.
-      Print 1 issue a month, out and distributed a week before the general meeting, every room and every hotel, saturation with the neighbourhood!
-      Working editors: Harold and Jean
-      Production Coordinator: Ivan
-      Distribution Coordinator: Herb?? Ivan suggests Herb, Herb confirms.
-      This is initial core group, then appoint another 7 people as editors (section editors) based on connections to issues etc.
-      Agree to this crew as the founding group?
-      With Dan Blair as the designer/layout guy?

Herb
-      We could talk to former employee at Red Wire? What kind of model they used for distribution and content finding etc.

Ivan
-      They had funding
-      But we should look into that
-      Motion to recommend these people for the initial editorial board, bring to GM tomorrow, and appoint 7 more later.  Ann seconds motion.

Ivan
-      Just catering, we need to pay them

Ann
-      Ok.

Ivan
-      Agreement for payment
-      No motion needed

Ivan
-      Add Illicit Drinkers Group presentation tomorrows GM and have Rob Morgen Present

Ivan
-      City and Postering
-      They are tearing them down
-      Motion or suggestion that we make a motion at GM tomorrow for that we depend for communicating

Jada
-      We don't have a space or place or poster board for them

Ivan
-      Can we send the City a letter that this is discrimination?
-      We will write a letter, but take it to the GM tomorrow

Ivan
-      611 Main Film
-      She wants to mentor 3 people on making a film
-      Tami is interested
-      Herb?
-      Yvonne is interested
-      Dave Hamm is interested
-      Model of interviews of people who live near the site
-      Other idea, make it a parody that mixes in the facts
-      5 minute video, show it as a testimony
-      Use people around the site who can be the actors, people who live in the building
-      It would be different, and be a surprise
-      Sharon Kravitz

Herb
-      Depends on who you have working on it

Wendy
-      Show her other movie, as an example, show to people to get an idea

Ivan
-      Will write a script for a parody movie
-      Sharon will do the coordinating and the work, with some teaching of film editing

Wendy
-      She has a good tract record

Ivan
-      Decision is to work on it

Ivan
-      GM
-      Change our discussion on what we said today
-      Editing the GM agenda
-      Chairs: Tami and Paul, Ann supporting when needed
-      Meeting at Carnegie at 1:30 and Dodson by 2pm

Close.

Friday, 16 December 2011

DNC Board Meeting Minutes - December 16, 2011

DNC Board meeting minutes
December 16, 2011

Present: Tami, Ann, Jen, Paul, Ivan, Jamie, Harold, Herb, Jada, Kelvin, Roland, Louie, Joe
Guests: Annette Morris, John

  1. Opening and introductions
  2. Discussion about the LAPP and low-income caucus
  3. Committee reports
    1. Action against violence against survival sex workers
    2. Street market
      • Vendors meeting Sunday
      • Other street market business (lock-box etc)
    3. Hotel organizing
    4. End Prohibition project
  1. Board issues
    1. Board conduct and anti-oppression
    2. Funding and petty cash
    3. At large members
    4. Next board meeting
  2. New business
    1. 750 E. 17Th St and city response
    2. Other

Opening
  • Kelvin gave our opening acknowledgement
  • Paul read the constitution
  • Introductions were powerful today, all members talked about where we each come from and about out lives and experiences in the DTES.

Discussion about LAPP and the Low-Income caucus
Wendy
  • We formed the low-income caucus of the LAPP to bring other groups into discussions about forming the LAPP
  • A conflict developed with Scott Clark from ALIVE because we disagree about gentrification, social housing, and maybe even harm reduction
  • We wrote a basis of unity, based on our perpectives, and this excluded ALIVE. We said to Scott that we thought he should not be on the low-income caucus.
  • Word has been out that Scott has been criticizing us on Facebook and in conversations in the community, and some of that has been picked up on by BIAs and developers
  • This could be bad for us and some others in the community might not work with us if we exclude Alive.
  • We should consider the main points of criticism from Alive
  • Proposal:
    • To apologize to Scott
    • To reorganize the caucus around curiosity about eachother instead of hard political positions. Curiosity not righteousness.
    • To ask Rain Daniels to facilitate these discussions
  • Phoenix said yesterday that she thinks that Aboriginal people like to have a space that can hold differences and not exclude people based on differences
  • We can question Scott's intentions and we've seen some weird behavior, but we should take the high road and also think about who he represents.
Tami
  • Scott is working with the business organizations in the neighbourhood
  • One of the main purposes of the BIAs is to gentrify the neighbourhood
  • I think Scott has already drank the cool-aid and there's no reason to invite him back. There's others we can work with.
Paul
  • If we apologize to him we're apologizing on behalf of the high-impact people to the business people
  • We have done all this work that made the Terms of Reference and we can't just let that be overwhelmed by one guy
Ann
  • The LAPP low-income committee should be reformed because it's not low-income people. Scott is not low-income, we don't know where he lives, we don't know how much money he makes
  • Scott doesn't want to be clear, doesn't want to say where he comes from or what he represents, he just wants us to take official positions for him
  • He came and overwhelmed us with his single-issue program of hammering at the Imouto issue
Herb
  • We as an organization should not be apologizing for standing by our constitution
  • He seems to be asking us to come over to his side but he's not coming
Ivan
  • Defending the motion
Joe
  • We need to defend the most oppressed people in our community
Harold
  • I don't think a low-income caucus would work if Scott was there.
  • We could set up another body to do some bridge building, but I'm not prepared to engage in planning and strategizing for the LAPP with Scott Clark. It would be against our purposes
Roland
  • It seemed like Scott was saying that he was leaving the LAPP as a whole
  • The question is: Is he being honest? Is he just using this as an excuse?
  • And: Is it a successful strategy to make this overture?
  • The low-income caucus is a political group. Maybe we could rename it the progressive caucus or something in order to be clear
Annette
  • I don't know who this Scott guy is but if he's not low-income then why should we give him an apology?
Paul
  • I don't think the constitution or our terms of reference say 100% of low-income people have to live in the DTES, we say 100% of housing has to be social housing in order to replace the SROs
  • And we never said we promote drugs, we said that we promote a healthy approach towards drugs and harm reduction.
Ann
  • I get that there's a political concern because Raycam could destroy what we're doing
  • And there is a place for a group like them. It's the big table of the LAPP.
  • If they're not residents or low-income people then we don't need them and we don't need to apologize to them.
  • What are we doing with a group that is funded, we don't know if they have an elected board, and they keep very bad company with Judy MacGuire and others at Raycam.
  • We should say to them that we're only agreeing with a city report that says no one who is poor should have to be driven out of the neighbourhood.
Herb
  • Harm reduction isn't just handing out needles and condoms, it's after-school care, it's getting families together, it's teaching people how to cook, it's housing.
  • I wish I could meet this person.
Wendy
  • Can we acknowledge that we could have made a mistake in how we formed the low-income caucus and we need something else
  • We can create a space where we can try to straddle some differences
  • We need to keep the caucus as a space where we do our planning
Richard
  • We didn't make a mistake
Ivan
  • Could we admit difficulties in understanding? And ask for space to work on understanding?
Kelvin
  • I've heard this one guy's name, but we should think about organizations.
  • The organization should take the seat. Raycam is an organization. We should deal with the organization. There are 3,000 people in Raymur.
Paul
  • We do not need to apologize, we should not say there has been a misunderstanding, we understand what Scott is saying. He is saying that he doesn't want Aboriginal people in the DTES
  • We're going to get some flack, so what? We need to stay true to ourselves and not send mixed messages.
Tami
  • Scott represents the business interests in the neighbourhood.
  • We should not talk about a person when we should talk about the organization they represent. I don't think he understands himself as a representative of Alive.
Annette
  • We should be talking about the organization, not this Scott guy. He doesn't know what our dreams are, he doesn't know what our lives are.
Wendy
  • The problem is that other voices are rising up
MOTION: To organize an understandings-workshop with Alive and others under the theme: What pushes people into and out of the DTES?
Defeated (4 in favor, 8 against)
DECISION: To form a committee of Wendy plus Aboriginal board members, Thursday January 5, 1pm at AFD (location TBD)

Committee reports

Action against violence against survival sex workers
Jen
  • Needs help with organizing the action
  • Kelvin to do opening prayer
  • Jen will talk about the history of the event and read demands
  • Ester Shannon from FIRST will speak; then Rape Relief; Tami from DNC; Ann from VANDU; WAVAW; BWSS.
  • Some stats we will explain include stats around women who have been murdered, how many arrests there have been.
  • Will ask for support for hate-crime legislation, the same way they lobbied for hate crime legislation for gay rights
  • Will also ask for non-enforcement of section 213 of the criminal code and the bawdy house laws.
Annette
  • Our protocols are that when you ask an elder to speak you give them some tobacco. Not a cigarette but a pouch of tobacco

Board conduct and anti-oppression
MOTION: To create a committee to investigate a complaint about Jamie Richardson (board member) by Charles Sanford (general member). The committee will speak with both Jamie and Charles and any others and will bring a recommendation back to the board.
PASSED unanimous.

At-large board members
MOTION: (from Louie) To nominate Annette for an at-large board seat. (PASSED unanimous)
  • Give Annette a board package.

Next board meeting: Friday January 6
Board development: Saturday January 7